Sunday, April 30, 2023

Parables of the Lost (Luke 15, 17) QUESTIONS

The Lost Sheep

READ Luke 15:1-2

What is the context for these “parables of the lost”?

 

READ Luke 15:3-7

How did the one sheep get lost?

How did the shepherd know the one was lost?

What did the shepherd do when he discovered one was missing?

What did the shepherd do when he found the sheep?

Could the sheep have found its way back without the shepherd?

What does Christ mean when He uses the terms “sinner” and “just person”?

Are Christ’s ratios right?  99 just to 1 sinner?

 

 

The Lost Coin

READ Luke 15:8-10

How did the coin get lost?

How does that relate to a person being lost?

Was the coin valuable to the woman?



The Lost Sons (The Prodigal Son)

READ Luke 15:11-16

How did the son get lost?

Why did he leave?

Why did the father not go after the younger son, as the shepherd and the woman went after the sheep and the coin?

How did the younger son use his inheritance?

What did the mighty famine do?

To the Jewish audience, what did feeding the swine mean?

What state is the young son in, wanting to eat the swine’s food?

Who does the father symbolize in this parable?

What is the inheritance?

What does leaving his father and going into a far country represent?

What is the mighty famine?

 

READ Luke 15:17-19

What caused the younger son to come to himself?

What does he do when he finally “comes to himself”?

What would a bystander in a city of that “far country” have seen, watching the younger son arrive vs. watching him leave?

 

READ Luke 15:20-24

How did the father see the son coming “a great way off”?

What did the father do when he saw his prodigal son returning?

What does the son do when he sees his father coming?

What does his father do at this confession?

What does the robe represent?

What do the shoes represent?

What does the ring represent?

What does the feast represent?

What does it mean that the son was “dead” but is “alive again”?

 

READ Luke 15:25-32

Why was the elder son angry?

Was the elder son invited into the house?

Why did the Father come out to entreat the elder son?

How do we know that the elder son has broken the father’s commandments?

Why did the younger son merit a feast while the older son did not?

Is the elder son “ever with” the Father if he remains outside the House?

Who is the younger son?

Who is the elder son?

What must the elder do to actually inherit “all that I (the Father) has”?

Why should the older son not worry about the younger son also receiving “all that the Father has”?

How do we know that this reading of the parable has merit?

 

 

The Ten Lepers

READ Luke 17:11-19

Why did the lepers stand “a far off”?

How did lepers provide for themselves?

Why did Christ heal the lepers?

What would have happened if that group had not collected together, knowing Christ was coming that direction and having faith in His power to heal, such that they called out for mercy?

Why did Christ not need to lay hands on the lepers to heal them?

Why did Christ tell them to go show themselves unto the Priests – was it to be cleansed by them?

What kind of faith did it take the ten to go to the Priests?

The ceremony to commemorate the cleansing of a leper is found in Leviticus 14:1-32.  How would you summarize it and what did the symbolism mean?

So where did the ten lepers set off to?

Why did the one Samaritan return to Christ?

Thursday, April 27, 2023

Treasures in Heaven (Matthew 19; Mark 10, 12; Luke 12, 16)

The Rich Young Man:

READ Matthew 19:16-17

Why did the young man come to Christ?

He genuinely wanted to know how to gain eternal life.

What is implied in his first question?

He realizes that he hasn’t attained to eternal life yet – that he is still deficient.

He thinks he can earn eternal life through his works.

He has overestimated his true state or situation before God; he doesn’t think he is that far away (note the singular “good thing” phrase).

He doesn’t understand that to have eternal life, we must know God and be precisely like Him.

He has underestimated God’s glory and how far he presently is from attaining it.

One’s perception of God’s glory is limited by how much of that glory one possesses themselves – the less you are filled with light the more delusional you are about the amount of light you possess because most people think they are “good” or filled with more light than darkness; the less light you have the less you can see accurately.

What is Christ’s definition of “good”?

Perfect.

Like God in every way.

Why might Jesus have reacted like this to being called “good”?

Christ is on His final journey to Jerusalem and He had not yet faced the infinite burden of the Atonement or attained unto His own resurrection.

Until it had been completed, the atonement was an uncertainty for Christ and He had to entertain the possibility of failure – even though he’d been prepared through eternities and had seen His Father perform the same act in vision (see John 5:19; TPJS 349:4; TPJS: 391:1; TPJS 421:3), He was surprised by the magnitude of the suffering when it was upon Him (see John 12:27; Matthew 26:36-39; Mark 14:33-34; and D&C 19:15-19).

He is trying to clue the young man in to the fact that he (the young man) is not as “good” as he thinks he is; that he really has no idea what it means to be good, i.e. to possess the fullness of the glory of God the Father.

 

READ Matthew 19:18-19

Why does Christ answer the young man’s question with the counsel to “keep the commandments”?

You must keep all the commandments to be saved; in fact, you must be precisely like Christ is and nothing else (see LoF 7:9).

Christ knew that the young man did not deserve/merit and was not ready for further light and truth; by divine law, Christ could not give the man a commandment he was not capable of obeying.

Why does the young man ask “which”?

Either he is looking to ring-fence what must be done (limit the terms so that it is more doable – similar to asking “what good thing”).

Or he is genuinely asking Christ because he has kept all of the commandments he knows about from his youth up but he has still not been promised eternal life (Calling and Election) – he is looking for the key to true worship and communion with God.

His question shows that his approach to eternal life is fundamentally flawed – he thinks eternal life can be attained through checking off a list of commandments he received through a man; albeit, a man who knows God and has access to Him and His commandments; he doesn’t realize that to place a man between himself and God is telestial damnation (see D&C 76:98-101).

He doesn’t realize that eternal life requires a direct and intimate relationship with God – no one has ever been saved without knowing God, let alone without ever having met Him; but he doesn’t understand this.

But he must get some credit for continuing to ask the Lord for specific answers to his questions, which are genuine.

What kinds of commandments does Christ tell him to keep?

The Ten Commandments – the fundamentals.

He tells him, albeit subtly, where he is deficient in keeping the commandments he thinks he has been keeping from his youth up.

In reality, this is just the beginning; he must abide by all facets of eternal law, as Christ has done.

Has the young man kept all of the commandments that he has been given?

No.

He thinks he has but he has not; he is not as righteous as he thinks he is.

He has not kept the commandment to love his neighbor as himself; if he had, he would have already given away much, if not all of his wealth to help them.

In Mark 10:21 it says that Christ loved the young man, so we can assume that He felt that the young man was earnest in his seeking; but like almost all of us, his mind is darkened.

 

READ Matthew 19:20

What response should the young man have given the Lord at this point?

“Oh Jesus, have mercy on me, a sinner!”

The commandment to love your neighbor as yourself, and by extrapolation to love God with all your might, mind and strength (see Mark 12:28-31; Luke 10:25-28), consists of far more than the young man understood it to; he thought he had lived it from his youth up but he had fallen woefully short of doing so.

Despite this, why is “what lack I yet” a key question that all of us must ask the Lord?

It allows the Lord to tell us, bluntly, what we must do to come unto Him and be sealed up to Eternal Life – if we don’t ask, He can’t answer as He is bound by our agency (see 2 Nephi 32:4; Luke 11:9-10; D&C 130:20-21).

But if He doesn’t tell us, we won’t be able to figure it out on our own (see 2 Nephi 32:6 and Alma 12:10-11) – we must receive this revelation directly from Him.

It is a plea for further light and knowledge; it assumes that what one has been doing (or the light that has been attained) is not enough, otherwise one would already be sealed up to eternal life by God.

But it also assumes that we truly are keeping all of the Lord’s commandments we have been given up to that point; this may or may not be true (see the delusion comment above).

What is the danger of asking this question?

He might answer it.

The answer will always be hard because if it were easy, and we were genuine in our seeking to know Christ and be saved, we would have done it already.

What is the danger of not asking this question?

You will not and cannot be saved (see 2 Nephi 32:4 and 7; LoF 6:3-5).

What might a better question haven been?

“Lord, I am blind!  Will you show me my weaknesses, forgive me, and bless me to find the strength to overcome them?” (see Ether 12:27-28).

Showing unto you your weaknesses could be either a) commandments you’ve been given that you are not keeping but think you are or b) weaknesses or darkness that you have within you from not keeping commandments you were not aware of because you lack the light and knowledge.

Asking for a blessing to find the strength to overcome them could either be a) aid in keeping the commandments you’ve already been given – which, by definition, you are able to keep otherwise you would not have been them in the first place, or b) giving you strength through a dispensation of additional light you now lack, to keep new commandments you’ve just been given.

 

READ Matthew 19:21

Why did Christ ask the young man to sell all that he had?

His wealth was a barrier to his truly experiencing full dependence on the Lord (the deceitfulness of riches).

It is only through the sacrifice of all earthly things that the young man would gain the faith necessary to answer his original question about how he might obtain eternal life.

Which is to come and know the Lord by following or abiding with Him.

He needed to lose all earthly tethers or fetters; he needed to be free to follow the Lord with no other desire; he needed to place himself in a situation where he was whole dependent upon the Lord so that he could exercise faith to a degree that he hadn’t needed to with a full bank account.

 

READ LoF 6:7-10

Why had the young man been given his great wealth in the first place?

To sacrifice it.

To bless the lives of others – to be a savior on Mount Zion.

As a test of his faith.

What would the young man have lived through and learned if he had followed Christ?

He would have accompanied Christ to Jerusalem for the Passover week: he could have witnessed the atonement, the crucifixion, and the resurrection.

He could have learned as an eyewitness, what it means to gain eternal life – to know Christ (see John 17:3).

 

READ Matthew 19:22

How many chances like this did the rich young man have in his life?

Only this one – it is heartbreaking to think about it; if he went away sorrowing from his encounter with Jesus, can you imagine the devastating sorrow he must be feeling now?

We never hear about him again in the New Testament – did he forfeit his exaltation as a result of his actions during that brief exchange?

The good news is that the Lord continues to call after us until the night comes when no work can be performed, so perhaps there is still hope for the rich young man.

What are the characteristics of an opportunity like this?

It comes when we are prepared – it’s never a “gotcha” or set up.

Occurs in a moment in time – a watershed moment.

Unexpected, unscripted.

Requires us to respond quickly – from the deepest desire of our heart.

Requires us to heed the inspiration from the Spirit that accompanies the opportunity.

Asks us to do some inconvenient or difficult.

May not be obviously “The Test” – can be subtle or seemingly ordinary.

Passes on quickly if we hesitate.

May not come again for a long time, if ever.

 

READ Mark 10:23-27

Is there inherent evil in wealth?

No.

God has all the wealth of the universe.

But for us it can be a massive liability – it tests our desires & faith.

How else are people “rich” in this world?

Power/authority, fame, reputation, credential/education.

So why did Christ say it will be hard for the rich to enter the kingdom of God?

Because so many who are wealthy trust in their riches.

And if you trust in riches you are unable to trust in God – at least to the degree you seem to need to, to be saved; you have more to lose when you put it all on the altar.

Does the Gospel demand that we walk away from riches?

Seek first for the kingdom of God (see Matthew 6:33).

Not necessarily, but if/when asked, we must be fully willing to do so; if we have attachment to our riches or really anything in this mortal world, we are in trouble and must work through that attachment to be willing to give it all up.

Every blessing is given to us as a stewardship from God; and they are always subject to God’s request to return them to Him.

 

 

The Widow’s Mite

READ Mark 12:41-44

What did the average observer see at the Temple Treasury that day?

Some individuals contributing large sums of money – without a check or credit card, it would have been very obvious who was giving the most money.

It would have taken the widow 5 seconds to get the 2 mites out of her purse and throw them into the Treasury box – most people probably didn’t even see her, and those who did may have wondered if she were holding out – “I mean, two mites?  That’s it?”

Who did the Lord take notice of at the Temple Treasury and why?

The obscure, unnamed widow not the “great ones” with their wealth.

The Lord grades on percentage of consecration, not total donation dollars.

What is the lesson the Widow teaches us?

Exercise faith to sacrifice LITERALLY ALL earthly possessions.

Have no attachment to the world and its possessions.

The Widow is living the spirit of which law?

The Law of Consecration.

 

 

The Rich Fool

READ Luke 12:16-21

How did the man become rich?

He was working – farming his land.

But his land produced more than he expected – i.e. he didn’t do anything special to get the extra crop and he didn’t have room for it – he was surprised by the yield, which demonstrates that he didn’t do anything to justify producing it.

He was blessed with the unexpected increase.

What is the key question that this parable teaches us and why?

“What shall I do, because I have no room where to bestow my fruits?”

This increase is an unexpected blessing from the Lord – what should he do with it?

What are the man’s choices?

Save the windfall and retire early (the deceitfulness of riches).

Give it away and continue to work.

Pray to obtain the will of the Lord.

If the man had known it was his last day on earth, would he have chosen differently?

Most likely.

He would have given everything to the Lord or to the poor (same thing?!) like the widow and her mites.

Why did the widow give all she had – did she have a terminal disease?

Most likely, no – unless you consider chronic poverty a terminal disease; her life expectancy had to have been less than the rich in her society but she was likely not facing death in that moment or Christ would not have highlighted her sacrifice in the way He did.

But when you have so little, two mites is not going to buy you much.

The logical approach would be that it’s better to give it to the Lord and hope to gain His grace – and lay up for yourself treasure in heaven but this requires great faith in God.

Is this why it is so hard for the rich to make it to heaven – they have that much more to lose?!  They don’t have to rely on God for their next meal.

 

 

The Unjust Steward

There are at least two interpretations of this parable – here is the first:

READ Luke 16:1-12

What did the Steward do when he found out he was about to be fired?

He defrauded his Lord by falsifying the accounts – decreasing the amount of money owed to his Lord by his customers.

Why did the lord commend the unjust steward for defrauding him?

He is commending the steward for his shrewdness, ingenuity and proactivity.

Why did the Steward go to those two particular customers?

They will agree to the deceit/fraud.

So that when he gets fired, those two customers will be more likely to take care of him, give him a job with one of them, etc.

What is the Steward worrying about?

How he is going to live after he loses his good job with the lord.

His future.

What is Jesus suggesting that we do when we find ourselves in trouble?

Make sure you have friends who will take care of you.

How do you ensure this?

By taking care of your friends when you have the opportunity.

How do you ensure you have friends at the judgment bar of Christ?

Use your money and time while in mortality to cloth the naked, feed the poor, visit those in prison for if you do those things unto the least, you do it unto the Lord (see Matthew 25:34-40).

And the Lord is the one “friend” who can save you, at that day; you are about to be “fired” by God for your poor performance on earth with His busienss and resources – or work and glory.

This parable shows that if we were as wise and motivated about our eternal futures as the unjust steward was about his mortal future after he’d been fired, we would be saved.

 

Here is the second interpretation – this makes sense in the context of the fact that Christ tells this parable right after condemning the Pharisees with the Parable of the Lost after they correctly accused him of eating with publicans and sinners (which was against their oral tradition law), and before the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus.

Who does the rich man or lord represent?

The Lord.

What are the Lord’s goods and what does it mean to waste them?

The resources of the earth.

To use the resources in a manner he hasn’t asked for them to be used in (compelling the poor to come to church in exchange for welfare money or building $2-billion-dollar shopping malls).

Who does the steward represent and how do we know?

The steward is the leadership of the Lord’s Church on earth in any age.

We know this because the Lord gave actual power of attorney to the stewards to call the Lord’s debtors in and legitimately “adjust” their bills.

Who are the Lord’s debtors?

Those who have entered into a contract or covenant with the Lord, by baptism, to be obedient to Him (see 1 Nephi 20:1-2).

Yet are witnessing falsely –they say that they have repented and have a determination to serve (obey) the Lord until the end of their lives (in exchange for redemption – hence the debt) but they have no real intention to do so – they are baptized pretenders, a Church full of hypocrites pretending to be Zion.

What do the bills, wheat and oil represent?

The Lord’s commandments, which the debtors have agreed to render to the Lord in exchange for redemption.

The wheat could be the word of the Lord or scriptures, which the steward conspired with the debtor to remove some of (change the scriptures and covenants) – or require only some of the word to be read and followed.

The oil could be works of righteousness which lead to receiving more of the Holy Spirit – again, much is missing from the debtors account in that they don’t have a full portion of the Spirit – haven’t been born again, haven’t followed the path back to the Lord to receive their calling and election made sure, haven’t continued on after that, true and faithful, etc.

What does “unjust” mean?

To do more or less than what was agreed upon.

To not be just or correct.

To not be justified.

What does it mean for a disciple to fail?

They did not finish the course of discipline to become a Master or Lord themselves, refusing to complete the required training through diligence and practice in the teachings of the Master.

They are not like the Master and do not know what He knows; and they most likely do not know how fully they do not know because the Lord’s ways are not man’s ways and they lack the light to comprehend Him – they don’t understand His rules and what they were intended to teach.

As a result, they lack the Master’s experience, wisdom, and skills or power.

What are the everlasting habitations?

Wherever that group goes who have not kept the Lord’s commandments – to hell (see TPJS 225:1).

Both the deceitful Church leader and the spiritually still-born but covenant making member will be together in hell, having conspired together to defraud the Lord (see Matthew 5:21).

The apostasy from truth happens like a kung fu movie where the apprentices don’t really apply themselves to the teachings of the Master – they are more interested in the reputation they have in being affiliated with His Order but do not want to put in the time to learn the skills.  When the Master dies, they continue to use his name and pretend to have his skill but because they never learned it, it is lost to them – they don’t understand what the scrolls of learning are trying to teach them – it makes no sense to them.  So, it becomes all about marketing, positioning, sleight of hand, and positional authority or strength in numbers.  If a stranger would come to them claiming to have studied with the same Master previously, they would try to kill or banish him, as he would be a threat to their charade.  (See Matthew 21:21-56); but if that were to happen and the stranger actually did have the Master’s skills, he/she would make quick work of the charlatans and pretenders – and all observers would be able to clearly see the difference.

 

Sunday, April 23, 2023

Treasures in Heaven (Matthew 19; Mark 10, 12; Luke 12, 16) QUESTIONS

The Rich Young Man:

READ Matthew 19:16-17

Why did the young man come to Christ?

What is implied in his first question?

What is Christ’s definition of “good”?

Why might Jesus have reacted like this to being called “good”?

 

READ Matthew 19:18-19

Why does Christ answer the young man’s question with the counsel to “keep the commandments”?

Why does the young man ask “which”?

What kinds of commandments does Christ tell him to keep?

Has the young man kept all of the commandments that he has been given?

 

READ Matthew 19:20

What response should the young man have given the Lord at this point?

Despite this, why is “what lack I yet” a key question that all of us must ask the Lord?

What is the danger of asking this question?

What is the danger of not asking this question?

What might a better question haven been?

 

READ Matthew 19:21

Why did Christ ask the young man to sell all that he had?

 

READ LoF 6:7-10

Why had the young man been given his great wealth in the first place?

What would the young man have lived through and learned if he had followed Christ?

 

READ Matthew 19:22

How many chances like this did the rich young man have in his life?

What are the characteristics of an opportunity like this?

 

READ Mark 10:23-27

Is there inherent evil in wealth?

How else are people “rich” in this world?

So why did Christ say it will be hard for the rich to enter the kingdom of God?

Does the Gospel demand that we walk away from riches?

 

 

The Widow’s Mite

READ Mark 12:41-44

What did the average observer see at the Temple Treasury that day?

Who did the Lord take notice of at the Temple Treasury and why?

What is the lesson the Widow teaches us?

The Widow is living the spirit of which law?

 

 

The Rich Fool

READ Luke 12:16-21

How did the man become rich?

What is the key question that this parable teaches us and why?

What are the man’s choices?

If the man had known it was his last day on earth, would he have chosen differently?

Why did the widow give all she had – did she have a terminal disease?

 

 

The Unjust Steward

There are at least two interpretations of this parable – here is the first:

READ Luke 16:1-12

What did the Steward do when he found out he was about to be fired?

Why did the lord commend the unjust steward for defrauding him?

Why did the Steward go to those two particular customers?

What is the Steward worrying about?

What is Jesus suggesting that we do when we find ourselves in trouble?

How do you ensure this?

How do you ensure you have friends at the judgment bar of Christ?

 

Here is the second interpretation – this makes sense in the context of the fact that Christ tells this parable right after condemning the Pharisees with the Parable of the Lost after they correctly accused him of eating with publicans and sinners (which was against their oral tradition law), and before the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus.

Who does the rich man or lord represent?

What are the Lord’s goods and what does it mean to waste them?

Who does the steward represent and how do we know?

Who are the Lord’s debtors?

What do the bills, wheat and oil represent?

What does “unjust” mean?

What does it mean for a disciple to fail?

What are the everlasting habitations?

Thursday, April 20, 2023

The Good Shepherd (John 9-10)

The Man Born Blind

READ John 9:1-5

Why was the man born blind?

He was not born blind just so that He could be healed by Christ, as many others have been born blind or with other difficult infirmities that were never healed by Christ but might have been just as “deserving”, in the various ways in which that might be defined; having said that, “deserving” implies some kind of justice is due and even in the act of being born blind or with any other sort of mortal disability (physical, mental, emotional), it is not unjust that we are not all 100% healthy and perfect in every way – this whole life is a complete gift. It was not a result of anyone, in this life or the life before, that the man was born blind.

But his infirmity allowed the mercy of God to be displayed by making him whole and the works of God could be manifest through his healing.

What is the relationship between light and eyesight?

If there is no light, everyone is effectively blind.

 

READ John 9:6-11

Why did Christ make clay to enable the healing?

He didn’t have to make or do anything physical to heal; remember that He had healed the nobleman’s son just by speaking the word, even though He was a day’s journey away from the boy (see John 4:46-54).

Christ and others (Elijah, Joseph Smith) used physical tools to aid them in their healings and miracles to increase the faith of those involved; in Christ’s case, it would have been to increase the faith of the participants; in the others’ cases, it may have also been to sufficiently increase the faith of the individual performing the miracle (i.e. why did Joseph Smith use a seer stone or the Urim and Thummim; or why did Elijah have to “stretch himself” upon the child to heal him – why did he need maximum proximity of energy connection points (see 1 Kings 17:17-23)?)

In this case, the blind man had to exercise faith by washing away of the clay in the pool of Siloam (“the Sent One”); his believing Christ enough to go to that pool and wash was a physical show of faith and enabled him to see via the healing.

Did the man see Jesus at the time of the healing?

No, as he was completely blind – Christ told him to go and wash in the pool to “execute” the healing.

He was healed after he washed.

What did he know of Jesus?

That He had anointed him.

That he could now see.

He would have heard His voice – maybe could have recognized Him that way.

He might have heard about Christ’s healing miracles, by this point in His ministry.

 

READ John 9:15-25

Did Christ keep the Sabbath Day holy?

Yes; He kept the Law of Moses as it had been revealed to the prophet.

But the Jewish leaders had changed the definition of what was lawful to do on the Sabbath – and He did not keep their law.

What is the danger in changing the Law (or standards) to be even more restrictive – shouldn’t it keep people safer?

If you change the Law in any way, you are in trouble – you are intimating that you know more than God when you actually know much less (see Isaiah 24:5-6); but you lack faith that God’s law will be helpful – you feel the need to add safeguards, as you seem them.

You draw the focus away from the spiritual realm and squarely into the temporal, physical realm – it is a terrestrial, rule-making mindset rather than a celestial, heart-changing one, since humans can’t really measure if a true spiritual change has occurred; they depend on understanding physical changes only and equating spiritual outcomes from what they think they can discern.

How can a man do such miracles as Christ did and be a sinner?

He can’t do good (which is defined as the will of the Father) and be a sinner (see Matthew 7:20-23).

By his works or fruits you will know a true prophet from a false one (see Matthew 7:20 and Moroni 7:13-16) – the fruits of this Sabbath day work was the healing of a man blind from birth.

The problem for the Jews is that they had changed the definition of what constituted sin because they had changed the Law; so because Christ violated their law (which was no longer God’s Law, but they didn’t acknowledge that fact) they thought He was a sinner – despite the paradox of the fact that He was doing godly miracles.

Implied in this is that spiritual power can be manifested in this physical world separate from God’s will; and even seemingly “good” things (by our mortal definition) could be done by a spiritually gifted person that were not the will of God at that particular moment – making them evil deeds.  The Jewish leaders are assuming that this is what is taking place here OR that it’s some kind of “parlor” trick like modern magicians perform today. 

 

READ John 9:26-34 (with JST v 32)

Were the Jewish leaders open to the possibility that Christ might really have been doing miracles by the power of God - that He was a prophet?

No.

Their going in conclusion (not just assumption) was that Christ couldn’t possibly be sent from God because a) He violated their Sabbath Day law, b) He was not a credentialed scholar or priest and was from outside the official hierarchy, c) He demonstrated actual power, while all they had was authority per the Temple and Priesthood keys, a focus on observable outward religious performances and a lot of teachings they liked to pontificate about.

Their logic was flawed because they couldn’t admit the possibility that Christ was sent from God – that He was telling the truth.

The fact that they would excommunicate anyone who claimed Jesus was the Messiah shows how closed they were to Him.

So, they were never going to see the truth because it was too hard to bear – it violated too many of their traditions about “the way things are” including the conclusion that they were in apostasy as they’d changed the Law; they were never going to become Christ’s followers, so they were never able to see the truth of who He was.

Why don’t the High Priests know “from whence (Jesus) is”?

They will not ask, seek or knock (see Matthew 7:7-11).

They are ignoring the Spirit of Christ (see Moroni 7:14-16).

They’ve never been to “whence He is” (heaven) so they don’t recognize Him or where He is from; in other words, they’ve never parted the veil, never been ministered to by an angel, and have never gone to heaven via the fiery portal.

What does it mean that they “cast him out”?

They excommunicated him – the cut him off spiritually – a death sentence of His eternal life – in effect, to make the atonement null and void for him.

 

READ 3 Nephi 18:32

Even if they felt he was wrong, what should they have done to him?

Minister with love, that He might choose to repent.

Do they have the authority to do this?

Yes – they are the legitimately sustained High Priests of Israel.

 

READ John 9:35-38

What does Jesus do when He hears of the excommunication?

He gives the man His own one question salvific interview: “do you believe on the Son of God?”

Salvation comes through the Lord and His truly authorized servants; they are authorized because they have been given a message directly from Him to us.

 

READ John 9:39-41

What is the danger in proclaiming “I see”?

Your sin remains.

You are saying “I understand all things and am now fully accountable”.

Your pride sets an impossible standard that you will fail.

You don’t actually see.  Seeing implies actually seeing through the veil and comprehending all of what you are seeing there.

As a result of all this, the Lord will leave you in your blindness and your sins.

Who is the “man born blind”?

Anyone who cannot “see” what is really going on – anyone who cannot see both the spiritual realm and physical realm is “blind” to everything but the physical manifestations or outcomes of what is going on in the spiritual world.

All people born into this world are “born blind” because the veil has been drawn over their consciousness and spiritual eyes; the difficult thing about being born blind is that you only know the darkness – you have no real understanding of what you cannot “feel” until you are healed, and then you are not even quite sure what it is you are looking at because you’ve never seen anything like it before.

Always remember that the Lord can teach all those who have been blinded by falsehoods to see, if they realize they are blind and come unto Him.  Being born blind is not a hopeless state, with a Savior at hand.

 

 

The Good Shepherd

READ John 10:1-5

What is the difference between the shepherd and all others?

Known: The shepherd enters in by the gate – he is known by the porter or gatekeeper (he is legitimate) and by the sheep (he is their owner – they belong to him and they love him) – and they will follow him out.

Unknown: All others must climb the barrier - because they are unknown to the porter and the sheep – and the sheep will not follow but will flee; they are robbers.

How does the shepherd lead the sheep?

The shepherd goes first – he leads the sheep – he makes sure the way is safe – he is their example, and they follow where he leads by listening to his voice and because he knows their names and will speak to them individually as well as collectively.

The sheep respond to the voice of their shepherd; they follow His example and path because they trust him and his words; they know he loves them and will not lead them astray but has their welfare at heart, even to laying down his life for them.

The sheep refuse to listen to another voice.

 

READ John 10:7-10

What is this “pasture” that the sheep seek to get to?

Eternal life or “abundant” life.

The pasture is within the sheepfold, not outside of it.

What does it mean that Jesus is the “door” to “pasture”?

It is like saying “I am the way” or that he is the “gatekeeper”.

Pasture or eternal life goes through Christ – there is no other way and those who promise another way are liars, thieves and robbers.

 

READ John 10:11-15

What is a hireling?

An employee not an owner; but a hireling can be well paid, like a CEO, for instance.

Performs the job only when he/she receives something in return.

The contract is entered into through mutual self-interest; a fair fee for a valued service.

What are the implications of this relationship? (Hireling)

It is a transactional exchange, which always means that it is finite and limited.

The hireling “keeps score” and is very aware of whether the contract is still “profitable”. 

There will always be a point where the hireling says “I’m not getting paid enough to do this” - at some point the hireling will run from the wolf.

What is a shepherd?

The person who owns the sheep.

What are the implications of this relationship? (Shepherd)

There is no score to keep.

There is no “get out” clause because there is nowhere else to go.

The shepherd says “this one is mine”; he cares for his own and will lay down his life for the sheep; he will not run from the “wolf” because he loves the sheep (they are his) and his own fortunes rise or fall with the health of the sheep.

How does the shepherd care for the health of the sheep?

He is close at hand – he cannot care for the sheep by standing far off or being remote.

He has not contracted out the mundane or difficult tasks to hirelings – he ministers to the needs of the sheep himself.

How do the sheep learn the voice of the shepherd?

He lives with the sheep.

Why do we need a shepherd and not a hireling?

Because a sacrifice is required to save us – an infinite and eternal sacrifice.

The shepherd will make the sacrifice and lay down his life for the sheep while the hireling will run.

Why will the shepherd lay down his life for the sheep?

He loves the sheep more than life itself.

They are his work and his glory.

 

READ John 10:16-18

Who are the other sheep not part of this fold?

The Lehites (see 3 Nephi 15:13-19).

The Lost Tribes of Israel (see 3 Nephi 15:20-22).

Others who have sought Him out – although, like the Nephites, He may not have ministered to them in the flesh prior to His resurrection (see 3 Nephi 15:23).

What does it mean that Christ has sheep distributed all over the world but they are of one fold?

They are of one fold because they share the same shepherd (Christ).

It doesn’t mean they are of the same fold because they share the same hirelings (Church leaders).

Christ is talking about people across the world and throughout time, who have sought to know Him and have found Him.

In a future day, they will be introduced to each other and come together to form Zion.

Why does the Father trust Christ with the flock?

Christ had already risen up to be a god.

He had foreknowledge of Christ’s capabilities from His choices and behavior in a “first place” (see Alma 13:3-5).

Christ is a true shepherd – He would willingly sacrifice His life – he would make a choice to lay it down; no one took His life.

Christ possessed the power to take His life up again to provide life for the flock – which commandment to do so, He received from His Father.

 

READ John 10:19-30

Why did the Jewish leaders think Christ had a devil in Him?

They could not deny the reality of His miracles.

So, they had two choices with regards to how He was able to perform them: either He was sent by God or He was in league with the Devil.

They were unwilling to be open to the possibility that He could have been sent from God, due to the fact that He had exposed them as false preachers with no power or authority.

As they saw it, they only had one choice: Jesus must be in league with the devil.

What is the problem with the argument that Christ was in league with the devil?

He did not teach the words of a devil – He spoke about repentance and a higher law of love.

Would a devil restore sight to the blind?  Devils are destructive in the use of their power – they do not bless people like this.

In a terrible irony, it is the Jewish leaders who are completely in Satan’s power but don’t realize it.

What does it mean that the Jewish leaders were not part of the flock given to Christ by the Father, and what is implied by this statement?

The Father “gave” Christ a “flock” or group of people born onto this earth.

That flock is a subset of all of the people born on this earth (i.e. the Jewish leaders are not part of that flock); this means that while all might be “children of God”, they are not all the Father’s flock or people or family or rightful heirs.

That flock belonged to the Father before Christ was called to be the Son of God.

They must have differentiated themselves through their exceeding faith and good works in a “first place” before this earth (see Alma 13:3-5); that differentiation included becoming the Father’s (Ahman’s) Son or Daughter – they had become “His” flock prior to their birth on this earth because they knew His voice just like they know Christ’s voice on this earth.

Implied is that they gained a relationship with the Father, either through a role He was filling as a Savior or through a previous Savior; also implied is that some others (the Jewish leaders and many others) did not gain such a relationship but that ALL of them might have been together in a prior eternity’s life.

 

READ John 10:31-42

What doctrine is Christ teaching here – that “ye are gods”?

He is teaching the doctrine of exaltation; that God’s children can all rise up to become precisely as God is.

He is also teaching that we are already Gods; we are self-existent, non-created, beings that are co-equal with God (see D&C 93:29-30; TPJS 395-398).

We have chosen to be separated from the divine unity and life which we had with the Gods in heaven, to be enlarged or gain more light through experiences that we could not have in a heavenly realm – there is a kind of perfection that only comes through experience of pain and stark alienation from God and each other.

Will we choose, like Christ, to rediscover who we truly are?  Christ was fully exposed to our mortal condition as an individual alienated from God’s presence and isolated from every other individual on earth, however He lived in complete fidelity with God – seeking and finding that oneness with the Gods that He had enjoyed in Heaven – thereby living a life reconciling our alienation – He bridged the gap between the separated, alienated telestial state and the completed unified oneness of the Celestial state and is our example.

Why is Christ teaching this doctrine as a defense against blasphemy?

If the doctrine of theosis (that man can become a god) is true and if God was talking to ordinary men (that it was possible for them), then how can the Jewish leaders condemn Christ for testifying that He is God’s son, as they, themselves, are “gods”, as per the scriptures.

How are we supposed to judge Christ – or anyone who comes in His name, for that matter?

Judge him by what he does and by his message.

If he fails to do what God expects or wishes, then you are free to reject him.

 

Hiatus

Due to some recent work and life changes, I'm taking a hiatus from the weekly blog.  I will leave the blog up for anyone who would like ...